Archway
This archway stands today at the entrance to a modern housing development which stands on the site of what were once known as the rookeries, Flower & Dean Street and Thrawl Street, some of the worst slum districts in the whole of London.
The arch is on Wentworth Street, directly opposite the entrance to George Yard, and as can be seen by the keystone, it was erected in 1886, two years before the Ripper murders began. It would have been one of the very last sights Martha Tabram saw before she turned and entered George Yard Buildings.
In the last 117 years, the matter of whether or not Martha was a victim of Jack the Ripper has been debated endlessly. She is not included on the list of five "canonical" victims, but many have argued very persuasively for her inclusion.
Her murder did not follow exactly the pattern of those to follow, but nonetheless was not a straightforward killing, thirty-nine stab wounds shows unusual savagery. Three weeks later the Ripper murders would begin in earnest, and the idea that there could have been two men in the district capable of such an act would be quite extraordinary. Personally I have always felt that Martha was a victim of Jack, and maybe not even his first.
7 Comments:
Thanks for a fascinating blog.
I am of the persuasion that Tabram was indeed a Ripper victim (and so was Elizabeth Stride). Sugden, Ogan and others have convinced me that she belongs on the list. The idea of 3 psychopaths roaming the streets of the East End killing prostitutes is too far fetched.
Great blog. Have you read Patricia Cornwell's book on the subject? She makes a very strong case in naming Walter Sickert as the Ripper.
Famous places and the the Egyptian monuments at Famous Sites
You are all gay!!!
Thanks for a fascinating and entertaining piece. Pity about the spammers and trolls.
Jack the Ripper would have never have gotten away with all of his crimes in this day and era. Technology would have stopped him. This is unless he had a lot of connections. Many people with connections can get away with just about anything.
After my former attorney promised to represent my interests, I told said person that my ex was letting a man sexually abuse my kids. Instead of doing anything to protect my kids, the lawyer used the information to extort assets into trust.
I ended up complaining. She then had me hacked, stalked, and assaulted. No one is willing to stop her. Even a State Bar complaint went nowhere.
You can read it here and see the great bodily harm that was caused to me:
https://pdfhost.io/v/jM.L2FJRQ_Petition_for_Review_State_Bar_decision
She is still practicing law.
https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/144148
Now I am being prosecuted. I didn't even commit a crime. Although Ms. Houghton has sex trafficked many other kids, she is too connected for anyone to stop her.
Valerie Houghton misappropriated about $10,000,000 from Clyde Berg. two weeks after Mr. Berg demanded an accounting of the missing funds, D.A. Rosen filed criminal charges against him. The D.A. accused Berg of raping a pregnant woman with a golf putter. He was then jailed for 8 days and forced to wear an ankle monitor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEg1fTduQp0&t=406s
Then after spending $3,000,000 in legal fees during a 3 year year prosecution, Mr. Berg was found factually innocent.
DocumentCloud
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6981163-HoughtonIndictment-Docket
https://www.mercurynews.com/2015/01/16/silicon-valley-millionaire-clyde-berg-found-factually-innocent-of-sex-abuse-of-wife/
Ms. Houghton was eventually charges with the crime of embezzlement But after 4 years of her prosecution, Mr. Rosen filed a motion to dismiss. It was stated in the motion that he had enough evidence to secure a conviction at trial. It should also be noted that the dismissal filing came at a time when Mr. Rosen was receiving reports that Ms. Houghton was engaged in the sex trafficking of minors and physically assaulting parents. He just didn’t care what message a dismissal would send to her.
Mr. Rosen has weaponized the D.A.’s Office to serve his needs and the needs of people who are associated with him. In the process, he has neglected the needs of public.
In the end, Ms. Houghton was sued by Mr. Berg. She ended up returning his money.
https://lawzilla.com/blog/clyde-berg-et-al-v-metaview-wholesale-investments-lp/#respond
Mr. Rosen also retaliated against another man who had discovered that his daughter was raped. When the man tried to report it, HE WAS ALSO ASSAULTED AND PROSECUTED.
Read more here: http://www.freearianna.org
I don’t know how this is all being allowed to happen. Mr. Rosen is jeopardizing public safety in the most cruel and heinous manners.
Post a Comment
<< Home